Skip to main content

Lesson learned : Hadoop + Cassandra integration

After a few weeks break at last we completed our tuning and configuration cassandra hadoop stack in production. It was exciting and i decided to share our experience with all.
1) Cassandra version >> 1.2 has some problems and doesn't integrate with Hadoop very well. The problem with Map Reduce, when we runs any Map reduce job, it always assigns only one mapper regardless of the amount of data. See here for more detail.
2) If you are going to use Pig for you data analysis, think twice, because Pig always picks up all the data from the Cassandra Storage and only after these it can filter. If you have a billions of rows and only a few millions of then you have to aggregate, then Pig always pick up the billions of rows.Here you can find a compression between Hadoop framework for executing Map reduce.
3) If you are using Pig, filter rows as early as possible. Filter fields like null or empty.
4) When using Pig, try to model your CF slightly different. Use Bucket pattern, store your data by weeks or months, it's better than store all the data in one CF. Consider to use TTL.
5) If you have more than 8GB of heap, consider JVM from IBM JVM9 or Azul JVM
6) Always use separate hard disk (High speed, i.e more than 7200 rpm) for Cassandra commit log.
7) Sizing your hardware carefully, choose between RAID 5 and RAID 10 depends on your need. it's better to create separate LUN for every node.
8) Tune bloom filter, if you have analytical node. See here for more information.
9) Tune you Cassandra CF, use ROW cache. Cassandra row cache is off heap cache as like memcache. Its slightly slower than heap cache but much faster than disk IO.

Disclaimer:
Every experience describe above is my own and it could be differ from any others experiences.
UP1 - Bug already fixed in version 1.2.6


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tip: SQL client for Apache Ignite cache

A new SQL client configuration described in  The Apache Ignite book . If it got you interested, check out the rest of the book for more helpful information. Apache Ignite provides SQL queries execution on the caches, SQL syntax is an ANSI-99 compliant. Therefore, you can execute SQL queries against any caches from any SQL client which supports JDBC thin client. This section is for those, who feels comfortable with SQL rather than execute a bunch of code to retrieve data from the cache. Apache Ignite out of the box shipped with JDBC driver that allows you to connect to Ignite caches and retrieve distributed data from the cache using standard SQL queries. Rest of the section of this chapter will describe how to connect SQL IDE (Integrated Development Environment) to Ignite cache and executes some SQL queries to play with the data. SQL IDE or SQL editor can simplify the development process and allow you to get productive much quicker. Most database vendors have their own front-en

8 things every developer should know about the Apache Ignite caching

Any technology, no matter how advanced it is, will not be able to solve your problems if you implement it improperly. Caching, precisely when it comes to the use of a distributed caching, can only accelerate your application with the proper use and configurations of it. From this point of view, Apache Ignite is no different, and there are a few steps to consider before using it in the production environment. In this article, we describe various technics that can help you to plan and adequately use of Apache Ignite as cutting-edge caching technology. Do proper capacity planning before using Ignite cluster. Do paperwork for understanding the size of the cache, number of CPUs or how many JVMs will be required. Let’s assume that you are using Hibernate as an ORM in 10 application servers and wish to use Ignite as an L2 cache. Calculate the total memory usages and the number of Ignite nodes you have to need for maintaining your SLA. An incorrect number of the Ignite nodes can become a b

Load balancing and fail over with scheduler

Every programmer at least develop one Scheduler or Job in their life time of programming. Nowadays writing or developing scheduler to get you job done is very simple, but when you are thinking about high availability or load balancing your scheduler or job it getting some tricky. Even more when you have a few instance of your scheduler but only one can be run at a time also need some tricks to done. A long time ago i used some data base table lock to achieved such a functionality as leader election. Around 2010 when Zookeeper comes into play, i always preferred to use Zookeeper to bring high availability and scalability. For using Zookeeper you have to need Zookeeper cluster with minimum 3 nodes and maintain the cluster. Our new customer denied to use such a open source product in their environment and i was definitely need to find something alternative. Definitely Quartz was the next choose. Quartz makes developing scheduler easy and simple. Quartz clustering feature brings the HA and